Microvolt T-Wave Alternans Identifies MADIT II Type Patients at Low Risk of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmic Events

Keywords:

Sudden death,Ventricular fibrillation,Ventricular tachycardia,Cardiac arrest,Exercise tests

Author Block:

Theodore Chow, Edward J Schloss, Theodore J Waller, Eugene S Chung, Santosh G Menon, Terri Booth, Alena Goldman, Erin Ely, The Lindner Center/Ohio Heart Health Center, Cincinnati, OH; Richard Cohen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA; Dean J Kereiakes; The Lindner Center/Ohio Heart Health Center, Cincinnati, OH

Background: The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT II) showed survival benefit from defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients with coronary disease and EF <30%. We prospectively evaluated whether T-wave alternans (TWA), a non-invasive marker of ventricular tachyarrhythmic risk, could identify lower risk MADIT II type patients.
Methods: Patients (n=203) with coronary disease and EF <30% underwent TWA testing primarily by treadmill exercise. A positive TWA was defined as sustained alternans >1.9
μV with an onset heart rate <110 bpm in 1 orthogonal or 2 contiguous chest leads. Patient management was according to physician discretion. Follow-up was achieved for 193 patients. A ventricular tachyarrhythmic event (VTE) was defined as an arrhythmic death, resuscitated cardiac arrest or appropriate ICD discharge. Endpoint events were analyzed blindly with respect to TWA outcomes. Data was processed using Kaplan-Meier analysis in conjunction with a single-sided log rank test of significance.
Results: Results of TWA testing were: positive in 97 (50.3%), negative in 57 (29.5%), and indeterminate in 39 (20.2%). During a mean follow-up of 375 ± 119 days there were 16 deaths (9 arrhythmic), 4 appropriate ICD discharges and no resuscitated cardiac arrests. VTEs occurred in 9 TWA positive patients, 1 TWA negative patient, and 3 TWA indeterminate patients. The event rate to 18 months was 11.8% (SE 3.9%) and 2.0% (SE 1.9%) among TWA positive and negative patients respectively; Relative Risk = 6.0 (p=0.035).
Conclusions: TWA identifies MADIT II type patients at lower risk of VTEs and may guide more cost effective deployment of ICD resources.